Quote of the Day: Adam Winkler on the Conservative Justices Questioning Affirmative Action

Scalia and Thomas claim to be originalists but it’s clear that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment enacted laws employing racial classifications designed to integrate African Americans. … Once again, we see that many proponents of originalism are really just conservatives for whom history is used as a sword to strike down progressive legislation.

- Adam Winkler, Professor of Law, UCLA

Tuesday Night Video – Scott Brown Reveals His Tea Party Self, Tries To Take It Back

David Gregory asks Scott Brown to name his model Supreme Court Justice. Brown, caught in the lights, tries to delay — “That’s a great question” — before naming right-wing zealot Antonin Scalia. Crowd boos. Brown starts adding every Supreme Court Justice he can think of, refusing to answer that “great question.”

Perhaps I’m overly sensitive, but I’m bothered by David Gregory’s love of bantering with Brown. Gregory seems unconcerned with truly getting to the issues, and more in love of being part of the game. He’s known for that, of course, as best seen in how he danced with Karl Rove at the White House Correspondents Dinner in 2007.

Scalia on Affordable Care Act Mandate

Ham and Cheese

You don’t interpret a penalty to be a pig. It can’t be a pig.

Justice Antonin Scalia on Fox News Sunday

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (Photo credit: The Higgs Boson)

Read more of this post

Politics and the Supreme Court

There’s been considerable speculation as to why Chief Justice John Roberts voted to uphold Obamacare as constitutional. Some on the right have blamed his epilepsy medication, which is only slightly less absurd than the idea that David Axelrod was planning on having Roberts offed. Really, if President Obama wanted one justice off the Supreme Court, wouldn’t it be the Giant Gas Bag of Righteous Rightwingness, Antonin Scalia? And if Roberts was dumbed down by his epilepsy medication, why didn’t the prescription work its magic when it came to him unnecessarily and without precedent limiting the commerce clause of the Constitution?

John Roberts - Caricature

John Roberts – Caricature (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)

Read more of this post

Anthony Kennedy Doesn’t Understand the Health Care Mandate

In the April 9th edition of The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin point out the worrisome sign that Justice Anthony Kennedy already doesn’t understand the health care mandate.

Consider, then, this question, posed to [Solicitor General] Verrilli by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy: “Assume for the moment that this”–the mandate–”is unprecedented, this is a step beyond what our cases have allowed, the affirmative duty to act to go into commerce. If that is so, do you not have a heavy burden of justification?” Every premise of that question was a misperception. The involvement of the federal government in the health-care market is not unprecedented; it dates back nearly fifty years, to the passage of Medicare and Medicaid. The forty million uninsured Americans whose chances for coverage are riding on the outcome of the case are already entered “into commerce,” because others are likely to pay their health-care costs.”

Toobin goes further in his critique, but the case is already made that Kennedy doesn’t get it, and that doesn’t bode well for the impending decision. It’s unfortunate that Kennedy is frequently referred to as a moderate, because he’s not. He’s a conservative Reagan Republican, only given our conservative activist Supreme Court, that makes him a swing vote between the moderates and the far-right wing conservatives.

Podcast Moments: This American Life, “Take the Money and Run For Office”

This American Life’s recent episode “Take the Money and Run” does one of he things that TAL does so well, which is to combine investigative reporting with compelling storytelling. If you’re interested in the details of political fundraising — not just who raises how much, but how, for example, the check is actually handed over — then this is the show for you.

I do take slight issue with how they initially present the old “two sides of the argument” argument.

Read more of this post

The Colbert Report on Pink Slime and Super PACs

MONDAY (April 3, 2012)
It’s a new week, and Stephen Colbert’s mind turns to thoughts of government regulation. This includes air pollution and food pollution.

Everybody knows, liberals have a long history of slandering good American industries with hurtful names. Sure, these days everybody hates “air pollution”, but when I was a kid, we celebrated it as “bonus clouds”.


Read more of this post

Obama Plays Offense

President Obama’s recent warning about the conservative Supreme Court potentially overturning Obamacare was the right thing to say, and long overdue.

Ultimately I’m confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected congress.

Read more of this post

Paul Krugman on the Broccoli Fallacy

One of the ways in which the right wing have taken aim at the attempt to provide health care in this country is to compare the individual health care mandate (a conservative proposal invented by their very own Heritage Foundation) to the forced purchase and consumption of broccoli. Yeah, it doesn’t really work on any level, but did you expect the Supreme Court justices to act like Tea Party enthusiasts? Paul Krugman didn’t.

Given the stakes, one might have expected all the court’s members to be very careful in speaking about both health care realities and legal precedents. In reality, however, the second day of hearings suggested that the justices most hostile to the law don’t understand, or choose not to understand, how insurance works. And the third day was, in a way, even worse, as antireform justices appeared to embrace any argument, no matter how flimsy, that they could use to kill reform.

Read more of this post

The Argument for Health Care

The Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments regarding the constitutionality of Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare. A newly released survey of legal experts says they’re doubtful that the individual mandate will be overturned. Remember, the individual mandate was originally a Republican idea, and these experts include a few dozen former Supreme Court clerks, which in turn includes a significant number from the conservative side of the spectrum.

Read more of this post

Jeffrey Toobin on Conservative Justices and Health Care

For progressives who wish that President Obama would be more, well, progressive, one of the main reminders of the difference between Team Dem and Team Repub can be seen in their impact on the judiciary. The United States has an active conservative judiciary, mostly appointed by Republican presidents, and they’re only growing more audacious in their efforts to push conservative causes using judicial power.

photograph of the justices, cropped to show Ju...

photograph of the justices, cropped to show Justice Scalia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Read more of this post

Ballade of Bush v. Gore

Since Justice Scalia has brought Bush v. Gore back into the news, I’ll dust off an old poem about it, inspired by the following part of that 5-4 Supreme Court decision:

Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional…, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed.

English: Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice of ...

Image via Wikipedia

For the wise Supreme Court, which the nation reveres,
For the justices, given the charge to restore
Our respect for and faith in our system, three cheers!
They’ve put all speculation to rest evermore:
It’s hello to George W., ‘bye ‘bye Al Gore!
And the crux, which the court’s sage majority notes,
Is an argument nobody’d thought of before:
There’s just not enough time to count all the votes.

More of this poem after the jump

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 395 other followers