60 Second Movie Review: The Cabin in the Woods (2011)

I’m not a fan of horror films, in large part because I get grossed out by gore. I remember seeing Poltergeist while staying with cousins of mine in California back when I was 12. It was in their living room, late at night, and I was alone. So, yeah, I didn’t sleep well that night. Flash forward a few decades and I’m writing that if you just see one Joss Whedon-written, well-paced, engaging, and inventive horror film this weekend, I recommend that you see The Cabin in the Woods. But if you are scared to go into the woods of possible spoilers, turn back now! This is a review that should probably just be read by those who have seen the film. You have been warned…

So, for the rest of you — just how much fun was that? It gets harder and harder to be creative with genre films. The basic choice is between trying to do the formula better than it’s been done before, or doing a version that spins it all around and self-consciously plays with the form. The Cabin in the Woods does both, as Whedon does a lot of what he does best. He gives us quirky, compelling characters who live in a world which communicates almost exclusively through banter, and then he puts them into motion by combining the staples of horror film with the what’s-going-on-in-this-world metaphysical questions of science fiction.

The sci-fi guys are contemporary but feel like they could be from multiple eras, from the 50s to the present, while the five young ones fit stereotypes that could be from the 70s to today. Many generations have shared the gift that is the stoner character. Much of that is the point of The Cabin in the Woods, as when Jules makes out with the big bad (dead and stuffed) wolf, it’s like blowing a kiss to the wolves of Grimms’ Fairy Tales.

I don’t enjoy simply waiting to be scared, which is why I appreciated that the film constantly kept us guessing, not in the traditional manner of who-will-get-killed-next-and-why (although it did plenty of that) but with questions such as “What is Bradley Whitford doing in this film and what is his character’s job?”

I had fun guessing and got some of it right, like thinking it was too soon to have the stoner killed off that first time because he was serving as a major stand-in for the audience, and knowing that the puppeteers were going to have to face their own monsters, as we the people would stand for no less.

I also got some wrong. I certainly didn’t think it would end with the destruction of the world, but really, by that time I didn’t care about having a clever conclusion, as the ride had already provided enough twists and turns. If we wanted to poke holes in the plot, it wouldn’t be difficult — why the hell would such a top secret operation use interns, let alone allowing interns to bet on the method of the mayhem? — but that seems besides the point, as the film was a play on films which acknowledged that it’s a film.

Sometimes, the only answer to an unjust world is to refuse to play along, which is another reason I was okay with the ending. The Director’s speech was a little unfair to Dana — after repeated lessons that Dana shouldn’t trust anything these people say, suddenly she’s supposed to know that this particular story about gods and virgin (or virgin substitute) sacrifices is the gospel truth? We know it’s the truth, of course, because A) it’s Sigourney Weaver and B) we’ve seen it all. We’re the voyeurs, the ones who watch with glee as everyone gets devoured by a smorgasbord of monsters, and unlike Holden, we’re not about to turn away when someone like Jules shows us her boobies.

As for the moral questions the movie raised, I’m a fan of any work of art that provides both entertainment and ethical quandaries. One of the implicit critiques of The Cabin in the Woods is that Hollywood consists of puppeteers arranging horrors for the pleasure of the bloodthirsty old gods — that is, the ticket-buying public. We demand sacrifice!


My last movie review was of Attack the Block (2011).
All of our movie reviews can be found here.

SEE ALSO
Shamelessly Awful Reviews for Shamelessly Awful People: The Cabin in the Woods
The Chiaroscuro Coalition: The Cabin in the Woods
CineSnark: Trust me, go see Cabin the Woods, or, Why we need Joss Whedon
the m0vie blog: Does Cabin in the Woods Out- “Hunger Games” The Hunger Games?
Confused Gender: Meta-Slash-Feminist Filmmaking : Cabin in the Woods has Lots of Gore, Boobs and Even More Intelligence

About these ads

About Matthew
I care about politics, but also enjoy tabloid talk. So what’s a boy to do?

10 Responses to 60 Second Movie Review: The Cabin in the Woods (2011)

  1. Evan Crean says:

    I do love horror movies and The Cabin in the Woods is easily my favorite movie of 2012 so far. It pays homage to genre cliches just as well as it parodies them. Fran Kranz is hilarious as the stoner Marty and you definitely laugh a lot. But to call it a horror comedy just doesn’t feel right because there’s still a fair amount of gore and some really creepy monsters. As someone who has seen it twice and is about to see it for a third time this weekend, it only gets more entertaining with each viewing, as you start to notice more subtle humor and references.

    • Matthew says:

      I can understand you watching it multiple times if only because when the movie ended I just wanted more. And I don’t know how to characterize it. Sci-fi Horror? Sci-fi horror comedy? Horror pastiche? Nothing gets it quite right.

  2. Tammy Salyer says:

    Excellent points in your review, Matt. I enjoyed the film for most of the reasons you mentioned too :) Did you also feel like this might be a film to see a second time just to go back and catch onto the things whose significance you missed the first time? It was a well enough written film that I think it had some of those layers. Leave it Joss to make it denser than your average Friday the 13th, eh? Cheers!

    • Matthew says:

      Thanks, Tammy! I think if I saw it a second time, it’d actually be due to the characters and the fun of their interaction. Whedon is pretty expert at that, as Buffy showed us all. I know that they don’t have the depth of certain dramas and that they’re based on stereotypes, but I found them so darned enjoyable.

      You’ve also reminded me that I’ve never actually seen Friday the 13th. I did confess to not being a horror aficionado, but I should watch that some day, just to know what it was all about.

  3. David Spira says:

    I agree with your review, but I think that it makes sense that Dana believed the director. She’d already had a pretty crazy day of discovering the existence of witches, zombies, sexy witches, mermen, a zombie redneck torture family, and a homicidal unicorn. At that point in the story, the leap to “world-destroying gods” isn’t exactly huge.

    • Matthew says:

      I agree that the leap to world-destroying gods wasn’t big, but it was the leap to believing anyone except Marty that I didn’t like. It probably doesn’t make sense for me to object to that one tiny thing considering all the other stuff going on. I suppose it’s a testament as well to really getting invested in the Marty character. Fran Kanz did a great job.

  4. I actually used to watch horror flicks specifically for the gore…not in a psycho way, but because I have always loved special effects. I would go and watch a film to see how the effects looked, then read Fangoria magazine to find out how they created these things on-screen. I loved old-school guys like Rick Baker and Stan Winston and Carlo Rambaldi. Then, after I got older and had a kid, that shit suddenly stopped being fascinating and started being scary! I can’t explain it – just a by-product of realizing that real life can be awful I guess, but now I avoid movies like this one even though I know they’re probably really fun and creatively well-done. Last scary flicks I saw were probably the Blair Witch Project and The Ring. Both good, but too intense for me now that I’m an old woman!

    • Matthew says:

      That’s interesting, that you found horror films scarier as you grew older. I guess I really don’t know how I’ve changed because I haven’t watched enough. I had forgotten about The Blair Witch Project, which I did see, and which scared me. I suspect if I saw The Ring, it’d be similar. Yeah, I’m changing my guess to say that I probably haven’t changed that much either way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 396 other followers

%d bloggers like this: