TV in Review: Mad Men, “At the Codfish Ball”

I usually dislike the “Previously on Mad Men” snippets which kick of new episodes, because they accent the melodrama, which is an integral part of the show to be sure, but less vital to me than the subtler moments. Nonetheless, “At the Codfish Ball” grabbed my attention as soon as I saw the face of Glen Bishop (played by Marten Holden Weiner, son of series creator Matthew Weiner). One of the weirder presences in previous Mad Men, I’ve been bemoaning Glen’s absence. How might the years have changed him?

If you’re not afraid of some spoilers, let’s talk about it…

We open with Glen on the phone, answering a call from Sally.

GLEN: Weeknight. Nice.

It’s a clever way of bringing him back into the series. Don’t waste time inventing a new way for him to appear; show that he never actually lost contact.

VOICE: Hey Bishop, who you talking to?

GLEN: Your sister. Just figuring out when we can ball.

Don is developing a relationship with his in-laws, the Calvets. They don’t arrive as a single character, but as two married people with their own tense dynamic. Don doesn’t have to please them so much as avoid becoming entangled in their own sniping. The Calvets have a tendency toward drama.

When we see Roger, we see that the LSD trip he had last time out was not a stunt to be forgotten, but part of his character development.

ROGER: I did have a, um, well I had a life-altering experience….My whole life people have been telling me I don’t understand how other people think, and it turns out it’s true.

ROGER: You know, it’s very interesting, but a lot of times you think people are looking at you, but they’re not. Their mind’s elsewhere.

DON: Lots of people that haven’t taken LSD already know that, Roger.

Megan starts to come into her own by coming up with a good idea for the Heinz account.

MEGAN: Heinz beans. Some things never change.

I definitely like the idea of highlighting women who have been kept out of the marketplace of ideas, and I suppose it makes sense for Megan’s intellect to come out in terms of advertising, given where she works and what the show is about. But I’d been hoping she’d be smart in a different way. Uh-oh — does that make me like Emile?

Emile is a doctor, but not that kind.

DON: When you have a high degree in any field, they call you a doctor. It’s from the Middle Ages.

Megan shows off her acumen even more at dinner out with the Heinz executive and executive wife, realizing that the account is about to be lost and prompting Don to make her pitch into his pitch, and right away. For Don, it’s a turn-on.

Peggy’s non-jealous reaction — in part because she’s got Abe on the brain, and in part because she’s a pretty smart cookie — is a nice twist.

PEGGY: What happened?

MICHAEL: Boss’s wife had an idea.

PEGGY: Is it any good?

STAN: It’s better than what we had.

PEGGY: Good for her.

Peggy discovers what Abe has on his own brain when he pops the big question.

ABE: I think we should move in together.

PEGGY (coyly): I mean, how would we ever do that?

ABE (obtusely): Well, however you want. I mean, I think your place would be better.

It turns out that Peggy is touched and excited, as the closeness matters more to her than the marriage license. They’re both very much ahead of the times for 1966. Peggy’s mom Katherine, not so much.

KATHERINE: I need my cake.

PEGGY: Why?

KATHERINE: Because I’m not giving you cake to celebrate youse living in sin.

Sally Draper is growing up.

Emile gives Don some advice, father-to-father…

EMILE: Don, there’s nothing you can do. No matter what, one day your little girl will spread her legs and fly away.

…while Roger treats Sally as seriously as he treats anyone, when they sit next to each other at an awards dinner.

SALLY: Who’s he?

ROGER: His name is Ed. He’s at Dow Corning. They make beautiful dishes, glassware, napalm…

Marie Calvet (played by Julia Ormond!) and Roger hit it off. What Sally sees them doing is the shock of the week. Not the act itself, of course, as Marie is demonstrating the carnal side of her life philosophy…

MARIE: We should have everything we want.

…but the shock of a ten-year-old having to see it. I trust that they didn’t tell Kiernan Shipka what she was reacting to.

There are some more cultured moments in “At the Codfish Ball,” including Don appearing to read. Twice! The first time, it’s Bernard Malamud’s The Fixer, in bed.

The second time, it’s do-it-yourself French language instruction, in the office.

At the end of the episode, we get Don’s disappointing realization that he may have burned too many bridges by that public letter he wrote telling off the tobacco industry. Indeed, no one feels like celebrating much, and there’s a group sense of despondency…

…as we wind up ending where we began, with Sally calling Glen on the phone…

GLEN: How’s the city?

SALLY: Dirty.

Despite the sadly fun endings, I found this to be a quiet episode. Solid, but not stellar. Loved last week, liked this week, looking forward to next week.


AMC first broadcast Season 5, Episode 7 of Mad Men on April 29, 2012.

SEE ALSO:
Polentical: TV in Review: Mad Men, “Far Away Places” (Season 5, Episode 6)
deerinthexenonarclights: Mad Men – At The Codfish Ball
Read at Joe’s: MAD MEN 5.7: “At the Codfish Ball”
Telephoria: MAD MEN: Scene of the Week
The Family Berzurcher: [Review] Mad Men, 5.07 “At the Codfish Ball”
I Might Have Thought What You Said…: Thoughts on Mad Men 507 At The Codfish Ball…

About these ads

About Matthew
I care about politics, but also enjoy tabloid talk. So what’s a boy to do?

10 Responses to TV in Review: Mad Men, “At the Codfish Ball”

  1. This episode was “quiet” as you say – but full of one liners and delicate (and not so delicate) moments. Megan’s parents were a little too cartoonish at first, but that was forgiven when they started talking. Now we know why Megan is so sassy and smart. From “Have a drink.” “Become a better person.” to “How’s the city?” “it’s dirty”…..loved it. Sometimes I’m too distracted being bitter about how good the writers are to enjoy the show. Know what I mean? Great blog – I’ll be tuning in!

    • Matthew says:

      The one-liners didn’t “pop” as much for me this time as they often do, but that’s a great point that Megan’s parents let us know how she got the way she is. They definitely put thought into how they function as a family. I agree that the skill can almost be a distraction, but I’m also the kind of person who can enjoy watching for craft and for enjoyment at the same time. Thanks for dropping by and sharing your thoughts on the show!

  2. Great recap man. This was the first episode of the show that I’ve ever seen live and I have to say that it wasn’t the ‘Previously On…’ but the ‘Next Week On…’ that confused the hell out of me. Up edited that thing? I’m guessing that Weiner makes them intentionally ambiguous so as to stop spoilers but wow, what a mess.

    • Matthew says:

      Thanks! And yeah, I sometimes skip the “Next Week On…” because I don’t want to know. I actually only got into Mad Men last fall, so I got spoiled watching one episode after another, without any of that stuff. Just the pure uncut episode. It’s tough to watch it live — definitely doesn’t come quickly enough!

  3. ladyanne314 says:

    “Quiet” yes, but still pretty amazing. Definitely the deepest glimpse into Megan thus far. And the two endings (the miserable table followed by Sally’s second phone call to Glen) worked like a one-two punch.

    • Matthew says:

      The endings were my favorite part, and I agree with you (and wifemothereventplanner) that one of the strengths was us getting to Megan and her family. I love all these new characters, but it’s getting to the point where we need more airtime in order to keep them all going. And there are a lot of older characters to bring back, from the baby Peggy had to Betty Draper.

  4. ladyanne314 says:

    Betty’s far from my favorite, but I kind of feel like she needs to make another appearance sooner rather than later. I know that January Jones was pregnant during filming, but how many trips can Betty and Henry take in one summer?!

  5. Matt Zurcher says:

    Marvelous post, here. It’s like my two favorite things in the world: Mad Men analysis and picture books. Thanks for tossing my roundup in the “See Also” section. Hopefully we can keep up a good dialogue together about the show. Good to know you, sir.

    • Matthew says:

      Thank you, Matt! I really liked your review, including the tidbit of insight from Matthew Weiner that the episode is about disappointment. That fits really well. And yes, I look forward to hearing what you have to say about tomorrow’s episode!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 396 other followers

%d bloggers like this: